semakin banyak saya belajar,semakin mengerti bahwa masih banyak lagi hal-hal yang saya tidak ketahui.oh.people..tidak sepatutnya kita sombong.
geez,its reminds me of one fav- quote of Albert Einstein :
"..I have no special talent. I am only passionately curious.."
Sunday 23 January 2011
Tuesday 18 January 2011
Wednesday 12 January 2011
Tuesday 11 January 2011
Sunday 9 January 2011
it is about 'children's freedom'
ngomong-ngomong soal anak-anak,well,actually its been a long time on my mind,sometimes..occured no-matter wherever I am.ini adalah pandangan saya akan kebebasan dalam arti yang sebenarnya untuk anak-anak,'it just make me post it here,(*krn ditulis dlm keadaan menunggu delay pesawat wkt mau balik dr bppn-jkt 1 atau 2 tahun lalu dan gapake wifi2an jd di tulisnya di m.word,formatnya kaya essay its ok lah ya:P,hehe)
Responsible Freedom in Children
The term of "freedom" can be very useful for the development of children, but can also be dangerous, it depends on the portions and depending on the context of its use. Excessive freedom given will be of omission. Even if sustained,it would make the child not aware of the limits that should be maintained,thus it does not support their development.
But, does not mean that freedom was given in small portions and then make the child being good. If the portion has reached the level that is too rein in or limit, regardless for the reason of affection or anything, it would also not support the progress.
First, not giving enough freedom may encourage children to develop a sense of shame or be shy. For example,if we oferly to correct his appearance. Initiatives child to show themselves to be pure hindered by our correction. Lack of freedom is also to encourage children to build doubt in the act thus, his decision is less strong or easily influenced.
Second, lack of creative freedom can also be into it. Children become parents watchman initiative because it is not trained to create. For example, we always insist children must follow all our advice, without giving the freedom to choose for the things that are required to be creative.
Last, children are also lack of confidence to be himself when the liberty continues taken by parents to dominate him. The principal to be confident is to do something freely,that there must be one or less risks.
Clearly,we need to contribute with moral values that guide them,rehearsal their responsibility through discipline or assignment, giving the option to train their mind to consider the risk of action,so that not be a disaster for our children.We should realize that giving freedom to educate is not easy. If just give freedom, it can be done by everyone. Therefore,it constantly need the ability to understand the stages of maturity and readiness of children.
oh iya, I think responsibility was born from a variety of problems and how we deal with the process.
alhamdulillah saya dibesarkan oleh orangtua yang sangat ngerti,"how to treat their child".nilai moral,agama,tanggungjawab,dan disiplinpun udah melakat erat.
Ibu saya adalah pedoman saya untuk agama,moral,love and care,how to treat people,another 'life' thing.
Ayah saya adalah pedoman saya untuk masalah disiplin.
Thursday 6 January 2011
When Acculturation Culture undermine People's Freedom
essay ini sebenernya buat apply form salah satu international group in germany,..daripada numpuk jadi di send ke sini saja :D
OK.we staaaaaarrttt,wuuuuz.
Diverse culture seemed to be a typical of life in this world.Culture is the norms and values that we hold in conducting daily life. Culture became the nation's identity. A collection of community will result in a different culture. The same culture would affect the results of development of civilization.
With the high of mobility, no wonder if the culture have now related. Various cultures interact with each other. In the life of nation and state, culture can not be separated from the role society that embrace it . There is a tendency cultural mix commonly referred to as a cultural acculturation.
Cultural acculturation occurs because of complex needs in social life. A culture will adapt to the surrounding environment. When a culture no longer be considered as a handle in solving a problem, then an external factor will appear. The factors that emerged from the outside this is a sign of the inability of the internal side of the culture to solve general problems.
When Indonesia was developing more advanced, then the culture was also developed. Our culture is experiencing a very rapid mobilization. The influence of globalization and liberalism became one of the causes of this incident. But do not be denied, the existing cultural acculturation is actually the results of our thoughts. The result of our thinking which is used as a reference. The thought that, based on the desire for a perfection. And to achieve it, then we will not hesitate to take factors outside of our culture.
When the interference of cultures occurs, then the norms and values (culture) that we have adopted will also change. Likewise with our perspective in seeing things. The question is whether the cultures that have mingled, we still think of as a culture? If viewed in terms of evolution, indeed all cultures have evolved. Evolution itself is one way to adapt to the surrounding environment. But if evolution is slowly changing the culture as a whole, whether this statement can we justify?
One of the newspaper headlines some time ago is a case Prita Mulyasari. She can be regarded as victims of cultural acculturation.When our culture still restrict the statement of opinion and speech, many layers of society who do not like going to a state like this. At that time, with a frill of democracy, then freedom of speech was proclaimed. Our culture is usually depression in delivering the opinion, immediately turned into a culture that free-spoken
It comes a way out to solve the problem. A substance from outside is taken as an early embryo. Our freedom to speak was put on the basic form of the substance that comes from outside. Human Rights is considered as the strongest basis for sustaining the right of freedom of speech. Next is the fact that the culture that we have adopted in the beginning has been transformed with substances from the outside. This suggests that the products produced by the culture will change.
When we embrace this culture that has evolved, there was a kind of feeling proud and satisfied because they feel has reached a higher level of livelihood. Culture that was not flexible with the desire of its adherents has evolved into a substantial culture which is closely related with the values and norms foreign.
In the end, cultures that we have been forced to change provide effects not taken into account. At the start of culture to speak freely provide fresh air for residents. Of previously (depressed) to express opinions and criticisms feel more freely. If the view of the process, then the majority of Indonesian citizens are not a pragmatic human. But in reality, individual country is mostly a pragmatic man who put the final result.Likewise who are forcing culture to evolve, not thinking about the effects and the occurrence of a problem, but rather look at things from the perspective of the end result or solution.
Case Prita Mulyasari may be regarded as an end result of the culture that has acculturated. Free Culture talk that we want has been obtained. All are obtained by adopting a foreign substance (HAM), which strongly impressed if combined. But we only look at solving problems at low levels. We did not consider the end product of the new culture. Who would have thought, free to speak their own culture to be one boomerang for freedom of speech. Intervention pragmatism nation leaders have led us to the freedom of the confined. It is ironic, cultures that had been changed (we change) to adjust the various problems instead became the weapon of his own master.
As a great nation, let’s develop a way of thinking. Do not look at things from the final result,but look at the processes that occur. This is important because the process tends to determine what is produced in the future. How do we know what would be generated, if the process we do not know,right?We should not directly enter any foreign substance. Think carefully before what will we get in the future. After all, in fact, our ancestors could live safely, comfortably and at ease with the culture of their own without intervention from any side.
OK.we staaaaaarrttt,wuuuuz.
Diverse culture seemed to be a typical of life in this world.Culture is the norms and values that we hold in conducting daily life. Culture became the nation's identity. A collection of community will result in a different culture. The same culture would affect the results of development of civilization.
With the high of mobility, no wonder if the culture have now related. Various cultures interact with each other. In the life of nation and state, culture can not be separated from the role society that embrace it . There is a tendency cultural mix commonly referred to as a cultural acculturation.
Cultural acculturation occurs because of complex needs in social life. A culture will adapt to the surrounding environment. When a culture no longer be considered as a handle in solving a problem, then an external factor will appear. The factors that emerged from the outside this is a sign of the inability of the internal side of the culture to solve general problems.
When Indonesia was developing more advanced, then the culture was also developed. Our culture is experiencing a very rapid mobilization. The influence of globalization and liberalism became one of the causes of this incident. But do not be denied, the existing cultural acculturation is actually the results of our thoughts. The result of our thinking which is used as a reference. The thought that, based on the desire for a perfection. And to achieve it, then we will not hesitate to take factors outside of our culture.
When the interference of cultures occurs, then the norms and values (culture) that we have adopted will also change. Likewise with our perspective in seeing things. The question is whether the cultures that have mingled, we still think of as a culture? If viewed in terms of evolution, indeed all cultures have evolved. Evolution itself is one way to adapt to the surrounding environment. But if evolution is slowly changing the culture as a whole, whether this statement can we justify?
One of the newspaper headlines some time ago is a case Prita Mulyasari. She can be regarded as victims of cultural acculturation.When our culture still restrict the statement of opinion and speech, many layers of society who do not like going to a state like this. At that time, with a frill of democracy, then freedom of speech was proclaimed. Our culture is usually depression in delivering the opinion, immediately turned into a culture that free-spoken
It comes a way out to solve the problem. A substance from outside is taken as an early embryo. Our freedom to speak was put on the basic form of the substance that comes from outside. Human Rights is considered as the strongest basis for sustaining the right of freedom of speech. Next is the fact that the culture that we have adopted in the beginning has been transformed with substances from the outside. This suggests that the products produced by the culture will change.
When we embrace this culture that has evolved, there was a kind of feeling proud and satisfied because they feel has reached a higher level of livelihood. Culture that was not flexible with the desire of its adherents has evolved into a substantial culture which is closely related with the values and norms foreign.
In the end, cultures that we have been forced to change provide effects not taken into account. At the start of culture to speak freely provide fresh air for residents. Of previously (depressed) to express opinions and criticisms feel more freely. If the view of the process, then the majority of Indonesian citizens are not a pragmatic human. But in reality, individual country is mostly a pragmatic man who put the final result.Likewise who are forcing culture to evolve, not thinking about the effects and the occurrence of a problem, but rather look at things from the perspective of the end result or solution.
Case Prita Mulyasari may be regarded as an end result of the culture that has acculturated. Free Culture talk that we want has been obtained. All are obtained by adopting a foreign substance (HAM), which strongly impressed if combined. But we only look at solving problems at low levels. We did not consider the end product of the new culture. Who would have thought, free to speak their own culture to be one boomerang for freedom of speech. Intervention pragmatism nation leaders have led us to the freedom of the confined. It is ironic, cultures that had been changed (we change) to adjust the various problems instead became the weapon of his own master.
As a great nation, let’s develop a way of thinking. Do not look at things from the final result,but look at the processes that occur. This is important because the process tends to determine what is produced in the future. How do we know what would be generated, if the process we do not know,right?We should not directly enter any foreign substance. Think carefully before what will we get in the future. After all, in fact, our ancestors could live safely, comfortably and at ease with the culture of their own without intervention from any side.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)